X, previously known as Twitter, owned by Elon Musk, Appears to Be a Poor Investment Now
As readers may recall, Elon Musk borrowed $13 billion from Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, and five other significant banks to finance his $44 billion acquisition. The deal has become the most detrimental merger-finance transaction for banks since the 2008-2009 financial crisis, as the Wall Street Journal reported.
For what reason? Banks typically sell the debt to others by lending money for takeovers, thereby earning commissions on the transaction. Due to X’s inadequate financials, this has been impossible. Consequently, the loans have become “hung deals,” as they have burdened the banks.
The WSJ observes that the banks consented to underwrite these loans “primarily due to the allure of banking the world’s wealthiest individual.” It appears to be a costly error unless they can extract interest payments from X and repay the principal upon the maturity of the loans.
November's NFT sales outpace October, keeping market momentum strong, with weekly NFT sales staying high despite a slight dip from…
Now, you can survive those agonizing web conference calls by pretending to be in the officen while enjoying a margarita…
Optimistic Rollups and ZK Rollups have emerged as market leaders, contending for dominance through various approaches to scalability, speed, and…
Shytoshi Kusama hints at the launch of the TREAT token, aimed at strengthening Shiba Inu’s ecosystem with trust, governance, and…
SHIB's burn rate soared over 4100% today as the crypto market rallied, with leading analysts suggesting a potential Shiba Inu…
Analysts predict Ether price could reach a $20,000 cycle top, with momentum building in early 2025. In the upcoming weeks,…