Tech

US sues Adobe: Subscription Cancellation Hurdles, Hidden Fees

The US government sues Adobe, accusing the software company of difficulties related to subscription cancellation fees and processes

According to a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice, Adobe has been accused of deceiving consumers by concealing the early-termination fee and making it challenging for individuals to terminate their subscriptions.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) stated in the complaint it filed on Monday that “Adobe has harmed consumers by enrolling them in its default, most lucrative subscription plan without clearly disclosing important plan terms.”

The government accuses Adobe of pushing consumers toward the “annual paid monthly” subscription without disclosing that discontinuing the plan during the first year would cost hundreds of dollars.

The complaint alleges that Adobe only discloses the early-termination fees when subscribers attempt to cancel, and it transforms the cost into a “powerful retention tool” by ensnaring consumers in subscriptions they no longer desire.

“According to the complaint, Adobe conceals material terms of its APM plan in fine print and behind option textboxes and hyperlinks during enrollment, demonstrating disclosures intended to be imperceptible and that the majority of consumers never observe.”

Subsequently, Adobe implements an intricate and cumbersome cancellation procedure to discourage cancellations.

Adobe intends to contest the allegations in court.

In a statement, Adobe’s General Counsel and Chief Trust Officer, Dana Rao, stated that subscription services are cost-effective, flexible, and convenient, enabling users to select the plan that best suits their requirements, timeline, and budget.

Adobe’s General Counsel and Chief Trust Officer, Dana Rao | Politico

“Our foremost objective is to guarantee our clients an enjoyable experience.”

Our subscription agreements are transparent in terms and conditions, and we offer a straightforward cancellation procedure.

According to the Department of Justice’s complaint, Adobe has been accused of violating federal laws that are intended to safeguard consumers. The government requests “injunctive relief, civil penalties, equitable monetary relief, and other relief.”

In 2012, Adobe transitioned to a subscription model, necessitating that consumers pay for software access regularly. The company’s software was previously accessible to consumers upon payment of a one-time fee.

The US Federal Trade Commission | Investopedia

The Federal Trade Commission, which initiated a comparable litigation against Amazon last year, asserts that the company “knowingly” complicates the process of canceling Prime service subscriptions, which comprise the majority of the company’s revenue.

Hillary Ondulohi

Hillary is a media creator with a background in mechanical engineering. He leverages his technical expertise to craft informative pieces on protechbro.com, making complex concepts accessible to a wider audience.

Share
Published by
Hillary Ondulohi

Recent Posts

Burning Man-Inspired Festival in Bali Goes Full Web3

During the Lampu festival in Bali, inspired by Burning Man, Web3 was put to practical…

4 hours ago

Nigerian Crypto Boom: SEC’s New Rules

Emomotimi Agama, Director-General of Nigeria's SEC, signals a potential shift in the government's strict stance…

4 hours ago

Hamster Kombat: Marketing Geniuses or Satirists?

200 million users are currently engaged in Hamster Kombat; the game poses enthralling inquiries regarding…

5 hours ago

Ethereum NFT Comeback Predictions

Over the past few years, Ethereum's gas consumption by NFTs has undergone substantial changes, primarily…

6 hours ago

BNB Sales Counts in SEC-Binance Lawsuit

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit against Binance and its co-founder Changpeng Zhao…

6 hours ago

Shiba Inu Gets Boost From Coinbase With CFTC Filing

Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, has announced its intention to include…

7 hours ago