Paradigm maintains that the regulator’s present methodology misinterprets the mechanisms and implications of MEVs, which are a critical component of DeFi ecosystems
Paradigm has expressed concern regarding the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) proposed regulations under the Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA), with a particular emphasis on the potential overreach of regulatory measures and the misinterpretation of Maximum Extractable Value (MEV).
The firm provided a comprehensive response to ESMA’s third consultation package, which enumerated potential negative impacts on EU citizens and the broader crypto ecosystem that could result inadvertently from certain proposed rules.
Concerns regarding MEVs
According to recent ESMA statements, the forthcoming MiCA framework will regard MEVs as a “clear form of market abuse.” Paradigm, on the other hand, expressed apprehensions regarding the regulatory body’s current approach, which misinterprets the mechanisms and implications of MEVs, a critical component of DeFi ecosystems.
Paradigm contends that the efficiency and security of decentralized networks are contingent upon the potential value miners and validators can derive from reordering transactions within a block, referred to as MEV.
Paradigm stated that MEV’s contribution to the DeFi ecosystem is significant, as it facilitates the efficient allocation of block space and facilitates critical market activities. The company maintains that:
“ESMA’s characterization of MEV as a form of market abuse akin to front-running in traditional financial markets shows a fundamental misunderstanding of blockchain technology.”
The company further stated that front-running is a conventional practice in which an individual utilizes inside information to execute transactions before others, thereby obtaining an unfair advantage. Paradigm noted that this definition does not apply to blockchain transactions, typically public and transparent by design.
Paradigm stated that the conventional concept of front-running is rendered inapplicable in this context because all participants have access to pending transactions on blockchains, eliminating the need for confidential information.
Regulatory overreach
ESMA’s intention to apply Market Abuse Regulations (MAR) to the “base layer” of crypto assets was also the subject of Paradigm’s feedback, which expressed broader concerns. Decentralized infrastructure administrators record and validate blockchain transactions in this layer.
Paradigm maintains that MAR, developed for conventional financial markets, is inappropriate for this decentralized infrastructure. The company maintains that:
“Applying MAR to crypto’s base layer would be a significant divergence from traditional financial market regulations. This could inadvertently include Internet Service Providers, cloud data centers, and networking software developers under its scope, which is impracticable and inconsistent with ESMA’s mandate.”
The company encouraged ESMA to conduct additional research and engage with the private sector to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex function of MEVs in blockchain ecosystems. It warned that the misapplication of MAR to blockchain operations could impede innovation and compel critical technology firms to relocate outside the EU.
Paradigm suggested that the applicability of MAR should be restricted to scenarios in which centralized services and platforms are administered by Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASPs) with direct customer relationships.
The organization declared:
“CASPs operating centralized exchanges should ensure fair market practices and transparency.”
Paradigm’s response underscores the intricacies of regulating emergent technologies using frameworks intended for traditional markets. The crypto industry is vigilant of potential regulatory developments that could influence the future of blockchain and digital assets in Europe as ESMA continues its consultation process.
